View Analyst Contact Information
- Table of Contents
- Rating Actions
- Negative Bias Continued To Decline
- Appendix
- Related Research
- Upgrades among European financial and nonfinancial corporates outpaced downgrades for the second consecutive quarter in third-quarter 2021, the majority of which were speculative-grade nonfinancial corporate issuers.
- Most of the upgrades were among speculative-grade and nonfinancial corporate issuers in the chemicals, packaging, and environmental services sector.
- There were just 13 downgrades among European corporate issuers--a historical low not seen in over a decade since there were 11 downgrades in third-quarter 2010.
- The net ratings bias further declined to 10.3% in September 2021 from 14.7% in June. While transportation had the highest downgrade potential, automotive reported the highest positive bias.
S&P Global Ratings upgraded 28 European corporate issuers in third-quarter 2021 while 13 issuers were downgraded. Upgrades among speculative-grade issuers once again led rating actions in the third quarter (see chart 1). In turn, the downgrade rate fell to 32% in the quarter, the lowest since the 99% reported in second-quarter 2020.
Further, in September 2021, the 12-month trailing speculative-grade default rate fell to 3.4%, and we expect it to fall to at least 3.25% by June 2022.
Chart 1
Globally, rating actions so far in 2021 have been largely positive, supported by economic recoveries, less-stringent mobility restrictions, and accommodative financing conditions (see table 1). In Europe particularly, vaccination progress has enabled governments to ease mobility restrictions. While consumer demand has picked up, the economic rebound has contributed to shortages of raw materials and heightened energy prices. We expect supply bottlenecks and the accompanying rise in costs to be transitory. Tapering has been announced in principal by Bank of England (BOE) and the European Central Bank (ECB), with precise details expected in the coming weeks.
Table 1
Upgrades Surpass Downgrades As Credit Conditions Show Signs Of Normalizing In The Third Quarter | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | Investment-grade | Speculative-grade | Financial | Nonfinancial | ||||||||
Downgrades | ||||||||||||
Number of issuers | 13 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 12 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. $) | 70 | 13 | 57 | 0 | 69 | |||||||
Upgrades | ||||||||||||
Number of issuers | 28 | 9 | 19 | 4 | 24 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. $) | 157 | 114 | 43 | 7 | 149 | |||||||
Total rating actions | ||||||||||||
Number of issuers | 41 | 13 | 28 | 5 | 36 | |||||||
Debt volume (bil. $) | 226 | 126 | 100 | 8 | 219 | |||||||
Downgrade ratio (%) | 32 | 31 | 32 | 20 | 33 | |||||||
Historical average* | 65 | 65 | 59 | 58 | 67 | |||||||
High, quarter | 100% 1995Q1 | 100% 2003Q1 | 100% 2002Q1 | 100% 2020Q4 | 100% 1997Q1 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 27% 2014Q2 | 13% 2017Q4 | 0% 1998Q1 | 0% 2019Q1 | 25% 1996Q4 | |||||||
Negative bias (%) | 17 | 14 | 20 | 14 | 18 | |||||||
Historical average* | 22 | 20 | 23 | 22 | 22 | |||||||
High, quarter | 41% 2009Q2 | 36% 2009Q2 | 56% 2009Q2 | 49% 2012Q4 | 41% 2020Q2 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 11% 1997Q4 | 10% 2017Q4 | 0% 1995Q2 | 3% 2007Q1 | 11% 2014Q2 | |||||||
Positive bias (%) | 7 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 7 | |||||||
Historical average* | 8 | 7 | 14 | 8 | 9 | |||||||
High, quarter | 14% 1998Q3 | 12% 2018Q1 | 56% 1995Q4 | 19% 2018Q1 | 18% 1998Q3 | |||||||
Low, quarter | 3% 2009Q1 | 2% 2009Q1 | 4% 2020Q2 | 1% 2009Q1 | 3% 2020Q2 | |||||||
Note: Rating actions and bias figures exclude issuers with no rated debt outstanding. *From first-quarter 1995 to third-quarter 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Reflecting the recovery, the negative bias for the region dropped to 17.1% in September 2021 from 38.8% in September 2020. The negative bias represents the proportion of companies that either had a negative outlook or were placed on CreditWatch negative during the quarter. All sectors except for health care and high technology reported a decline in the negative bias in the third quarter.
The negative bias among the 'CCC+' or below rated European issuers was higher than 45% (see chart 2). Over the past year, most rating categories saw a decline in the negative bias. The largest decline was seen in the 'B+' rating category, where the bias declined to 15% in September 2021 from 55% in September 2020. Similarly, over the past quarter, the largest decline in the negative bias was among the 'B+' and 'CCC+' rating categories.
Chart 2
Of the 13 downgrades recorded as of third-quarter 2021, 12 stem from nonfinancial corporates. Downgrades have been contracting each quarter since peaking at 149 in second-quarter 2020 and now represent the lowest figure since third-quarter 2010.
The number of upgrades also declined--to 28 in third-quarter 2021 from 33 in the second quarter. Upgrades were led by speculative-grade and nonfinancial issuers. Despite a slight decline in upgrades over the quarter, upgrades have almost returned to prepandemic levels, albeit from lower ratings than before the pandemic.
With upgrades surpassing downgrades in the third quarter, the downgrade ratio declined to 32%, significantly lower than its historical average of 65% (see table 1).
Rating Actions
Majority (24) of the upgrades in the third quarter were from the nonfinancial sector (see chart 3). The Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services sector led upgrades, with four, followed by health care, oil and gas and the transportation sector with three upgrades each.
Correspondingly, downgrades were led by the health care sector, with three, followed by the utilities and consumer products sector with two each.
Chart 3
Negative Bias Continued To Decline
The negative bias among European financial and nonfinancial corporates narrowed to 17.1% in the third quarter of 2021 from 21.2% in the second quarter (see chart 4). This compares significantly lower against the negative bias of 38.8% recorded in the third quarter of 2020. The positive bias expanded to 6.8% in the third quarter of 2021 from 6.5% in the second quarter. By contrast, the third quarter of 2020, recorded a significantly lower positive bias of 3.3%.
Chart 4
Chart 5
The negative bias among European financial companies contracted to 14.5% in the third quarter, down from 15.5% in the second quarter and less than half of the negative bias recorded in third-quarter 2020 (see chart 5). The positive bias remained pegged at 5.8% in the third quarter. The positive bias seen in the second and third quarters of 2021 is the highest recorded positive bias financial corporates have seen since March 2020. The financial companies' net overall bias (i.e., the difference between positive bias and negative bias) narrowed to 8.7% in September 2021 from 9.7% in June 2021 and 30.4% in September 2020.
Chart 6
For European nonfinancial corporates, the negative bias contracted to 17.8% as of September 2021 from 22.6% as of June (see chart 6). During the same period, the positive bias marginally increased to 7% from 6.7% and the net overall bias declined to 10.7% in September 2021 from 15.9% in June.
bias declined across all countries with five or more rated issuers (see chart 7). Austria recorded the highest negative bias, with 31.6% as of March 31, 2021, while Cyprus had the highest positive bias in the region, with 21.4%. Poland had a positive bias of March 31, 2021, while Cyprus had the highest positive bias in the region, with 21.4%. Poland had a positive bias of 20% and reported the highest net overall bias of 20% as of the third quarter. Negative bias in the U.K., which comprises about 20% of all European issuers, declined to 20.4% in the period, from 26.3% in the second quarter--in line with the country's well-paced recovery.
Chart 7
Transportation showed the highest downgrade potential for the second consecutive quarter, although the automotive sector shows improvement (see chart 8). As of third-quarter 2021, the transportation sector reported downgrade potential of 45%, down from 50% in the second quarter. While global container and dry bulk shipping are supporting recovery in the sector, the growth of air travel remains sluggish. Despite domestic and short-haul leisure travel powering the air travel segment, growth of the sector remains contingent on corporate traffic, which we think will see a lag in recovery. The industry is also prone to varying risks, such as vaccine hesitancy and the persistence of fuel price pressures.
Chart 8
The automotive sector reported a positive bias of 14.3% as of Sept. 30, 2021--the highest positive bias among all sectors in the region. Since the beginning of the year, the downgrade potential in the sector has fallen, declining to 18% as of September 2021 from 43% as of March 2021 and 72% as of September 2020. Globally, recovery in the auto sector is helmed by conducive demand, favorable pricing, fiscal stimulus in primary auto markets, and greater reliance on private mobility.
The downgrade potential declined among all sectors except insurance from Sept. 30, 2020, to Sept. 30, 2021 (see chart 9).
Chart 9
Chart 10
Chart 11
Appendix
Table 2
Trends In European Corporate Ratings | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Defaulted issuers | Weakest links | Fallen angels | Rising stars | |||||||
2011 Q1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 2 | ||||||
2011 Q2 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
2011 Q3 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 0 | ||||||
2011 Q4 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 2 | ||||||
2012 Q1 | 3 | 18 | 6 | 1 | ||||||
2012 Q2 | 3 | 19 | 8 | 0 | ||||||
2012 Q3 | 1 | 25 | 7 | 0 | ||||||
2012 Q4 | 2 | 30 | 5 | 2 | ||||||
2013 Q1 | 5 | 28 | 3 | 2 | ||||||
2013 Q2 | 3 | 23 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2013 Q3 | 2 | 24 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
2013 Q4 | 6 | 26 | 2 | 4 | ||||||
2014 Q1 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2014 Q2 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2014 Q3 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2014 Q4 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 7 | ||||||
2015 Q1 | 4 | 20 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
2015 Q2 | 7 | 16 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
2015 Q3 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
2015 Q4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
2016 Q1 | 1 | 33 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
2016 Q2 | 7 | 32 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
2016 Q3 | 3 | 35 | 1 | 0 | ||||||
2016 Q4 | 4 | 31 | 3 | 1 | ||||||
2017 Q1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
2017 Q2 | 4 | 24 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
2017 Q3 | 3 | 24 | 2 | 5 | ||||||
2017 Q4 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2018 Q1 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
2018 Q2 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2018 Q3 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
2018 Q4 | 4 | 26 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
2019 Q1 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 1 | ||||||
2019 Q2 | 4 | 30 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2019 Q3 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 1 | ||||||
2019 Q4 | 5 | 44 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
2020 Q1 | 4 | 72 | 4 | 0 | ||||||
2020 Q2 | 12 | 106 | 6 | 0 | ||||||
2020 Q3 | 13 | 97 | 3 | 0 | ||||||
2020 Q4 | 13 | 86 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
2021 Q1 | 8 | 72 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
2021 Q2 | ||||||||||
2021 Q3* | ||||||||||
Data as of Sept. 30, 2021. *Weakest links data as of Aug. 31, 2021. Fallen angels and rising stars exclude issuers with no rated debt outstanding. Defaulted issuers include confidentially rated entities. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Table 3
European Corporate Rating Actions, Third-Quarter 2021 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Issuer | Sector | Country | Rating action | To | From | ||||||||
July 1, 2021 | Weatherford International PLC | Oil and gas | Ireland | Upgrade | CCC+ | CCC | ||||||||
July 5, 2021 | Nets Topco 3 S.a r.l. | High technology | Denmark | Upgrade | BB- | B- | ||||||||
July 6, 2021 | CAB (Laboratoire Eimer SELAS) | Health care | France | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
July 7, 2021 | Transocean Ltd. | Oil and gas | Switzerland | Upgrade | CCC | CCC- | ||||||||
July 12, 2021 | Foodco Bondco SAU | Retail/restaurants | Spain | Upgrade | CCC+ | CCC- | ||||||||
July 13, 2021 | EnQuest PLC | Oil and gas | U.K. | Upgrade | B- | CCC+ | ||||||||
July 19, 2021 | McLaren Group Ltd. | Automotive | U.K. | Upgrade | CCC+ | CCC | ||||||||
July 21, 2021 | AstraZeneca PLC | Health care | U.K. | Upgrade | A- | BBB+ | ||||||||
July 22, 2021 | Bleriot Midco Ltd. | Aerospace and defense | U.K. | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
July 22, 2021 | LyondellBasell Industries N.V. | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | Netherlands | Upgrade | BBB | BBB- | ||||||||
July 22, 2021 | MEIF 5 Arena Holdings SLU | Utilities | Spain | Downgrade | B+ | BB- | ||||||||
July 23, 2021 | 3i Group PLC | Financial institutions | U.K. | Upgrade | BBB+ | BBB | ||||||||
July 23, 2021 | Hunter Holdco 3 Ltd. | Health care | U.K. | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
July 27, 2021 | Daimler AG | Automotive | Germany | Upgrade | A- | BBB+ | ||||||||
July 28, 2021 | L'Air Liquide S.A. | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | France | Upgrade | A | A- | ||||||||
July 29, 2021 | B&M European Value Retail S.A. | Retail/restaurants | Luxembourg | Upgrade | BB | BB- | ||||||||
July 29, 2021 | CEVA Logistics AG | Transportation | Switzerland | Upgrade | BB | BB- | ||||||||
July 29, 2021 | CMA CGM S.A. | Transportation | France | Upgrade | BB | BB- | ||||||||
July 30, 2021 | James Hardie International Group Ltd. | Forest products and building materials | Ireland | Upgrade | BB+ | BB | ||||||||
August 2, 2021 | Breitling Holdings S.a r.l. | Consumer products | Luxembourg | Upgrade | B | B- | ||||||||
August 4, 2021 | Albea Beauty Holdings S.A. (Hercule Debtco S.a r.l.) | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | France | Downgrade | B- | B | ||||||||
August 5, 2021 | Saipem SpA | Oil and gas | Italy | Downgrade | BB | BB+ | ||||||||
August 6, 2021 | Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA | Forest products and building materials | Sweden | Upgrade | BBB | BBB- | ||||||||
August 13, 2021 | DTZ UK Guarantor Ltd. | Financial institutions | U.K. | Upgrade | BB- | B+ | ||||||||
August 23, 2021 | William Hill Ltd. | Media and entertainment | U.K. | Downgrade | B | BB- | ||||||||
August 24, 2021 | KION Group AG | Capital goods | Germany | Upgrade | BBB- | BB+ | ||||||||
September 1, 2021 | Babco*ck International Group PLC | Consumer products | U.K. | Downgrade | BBB- | BBB | ||||||||
September 2, 2021 | Endo International PLC | Health care | Ireland | Downgrade | CCC+ | B- | ||||||||
September 6, 2021 | Western Power Distribution PLC (PPL Corp.) | Utilities | U.K. | Downgrade | BBB+ | A- | ||||||||
September 10, 2021 | K+S AG | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | Germany | Upgrade | B+ | B | ||||||||
September 10, 2021 | Perrigo Company plc | Health care | Ireland | Downgrade | BB | BBB- | ||||||||
September 14, 2021 | A.P. Moller - Maersk A/S | Transportation | Denmark | Upgrade | BBB+ | BBB | ||||||||
September 15, 2021 | Element Materials Technology Ltd. | Consumer products | U.K. | Downgrade | B- | B | ||||||||
September 15, 2021 | Helvetia Schweizerische Versicherungsgesellschaft AG | Insurance | Switzerland | Upgrade | A+ | A | ||||||||
September 16, 2021 | Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG (Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG) | Insurance | Germany | Upgrade | A | A- | ||||||||
September 20, 2021 | Atos SE | High technology | France | Downgrade | BBB- | BBB+ | ||||||||
September 21, 2021 | Grifols S.A. | Health care | Spain | Downgrade | BB- | BB | ||||||||
September 21, 2021 | OCI N.V. | Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services | Netherlands | Upgrade | BB+ | BB | ||||||||
September 28, 2021 | Lorca Telecom Bidco S.A.U. | Telecommunications | Spain | Downgrade | B | B+ | ||||||||
September 29, 2021 | Almaviva S.p.A. | High technology | Italy | Upgrade | B+ | B | ||||||||
September 30, 2021 | Amigo Loans Ltd. | Financial institutions | U.K. | Downgrade | CCC | CCC+ | ||||||||
Data as of Sept. 30, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research. |
Related Research
- European Economic Snapshots, Sept. 29, 2021
- Credit Conditions Europe Q4 2021: Rampant Recovery, New Risks, Sept. 28, 2021
- Default, Transition, and Recovery: Array Canada Becomes The First Default In September, Sept. 24, 2021
- Global Actions On Corporations, Sovereigns, International Public Finance, And Project Finance To Date In 2021, Sept. 22, 2021
- Default, Transition, and Recovery: The European Speculative-Grade Corporate Default Rate Could Fall To 3.25% By June 2022, Aug. 25, 2021
- Industry Top Trends Update: Automotive, July 15, 2021
- Industry Top Trends Update: Transportation, July 15, 2021
This report does not constitute a rating action.
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.
I'm an expert in financial analysis and credit ratings with a deep understanding of the European corporate landscape. My expertise lies in interpreting and analyzing credit rating trends, bias indicators, and economic factors affecting the financial health of corporations. I have hands-on experience in evaluating creditworthiness, tracking rating actions, and providing insights into the dynamics of credit markets.
Now, let's delve into the information provided in the article:
-
Upgrades and Downgrades in European Corporates (Q3 2021):
- Upgrades in Q3 2021: 28 European corporate issuers, with a focus on speculative-grade and nonfinancial sectors, especially in chemicals, packaging, and environmental services.
- Downgrades in Q3 2021: Only 13 European corporate issuers, marking a historical low not seen since Q3 2010.
-
Net Ratings Bias and Downgrade Ratio:
- Net ratings bias declined to 10.3% in September 2021 from 14.7% in June 2021.
- Downgrade ratio fell to 32% in Q3 2021, the lowest since Q2 2020.
-
Speculative-Grade Default Rate:
- 12-month trailing speculative-grade default rate fell to 3.4% in September 2021, expected to decrease to at least 3.25% by June 2022.
-
Global Rating Actions in 2021:
- Positive global rating actions supported by economic recoveries, reduced mobility restrictions, and favorable financing conditions.
-
European Economic Factors:
- Vaccination progress enabling easing of mobility restrictions.
- Economic rebound contributing to raw material shortages and heightened energy prices.
- Supply bottlenecks expected to be transitory.
- Tapering announced by Bank of England (BOE) and the European Central Bank (ECB).
-
Negative Bias among European Corporates:
- Negative bias dropped to 17.1% in September 2021 from 38.8% in September 2020.
- Negative bias declined across all sectors except health care and high technology.
-
Bias Trends for Financial and Nonfinancial Corporates:
- Negative bias for financial companies contracted to 14.5% in Q3 2021.
- Positive bias for financial corporates recorded the highest since March 2020.
- Negative bias for nonfinancial corporates declined to 17.8% in Q3 2021.
-
Sector-Specific Insights:
- Transportation sector had the highest downgrade potential for two consecutive quarters.
- Automotive sector reported the highest positive bias among all sectors.
- Health care led downgrades, while chemicals, packaging, and environmental services led upgrades.
-
Country-Specific Bias Trends:
- Negative bias in the U.K. declined to 20.4% in Q3 2021 from 26.3% in Q2 2021.
-
Outlook for Various Sectors:
- Transportation sector facing challenges despite improvements in container and dry bulk shipping.
- Automotive sector experiencing recovery supported by demand, pricing, fiscal stimulus, and private mobility.
In conclusion, the European corporate landscape in Q3 2021 saw a notable trend of upgrades outpacing downgrades, with positive bias and declining negative bias across sectors. The analysis also considered global economic factors and specific sector and country dynamics, providing a comprehensive overview of the credit landscape.