Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (2024)

View Analyst Contact Information

  • Table of Contents
    • Rating Actions
    • Negative Bias Continued To Decline
    • Appendix
    • Related Research
  • Upgrades among European financial and nonfinancial corporates outpaced downgrades for the second consecutive quarter in third-quarter 2021, the majority of which were speculative-grade nonfinancial corporate issuers.
  • Most of the upgrades were among speculative-grade and nonfinancial corporate issuers in the chemicals, packaging, and environmental services sector.
  • There were just 13 downgrades among European corporate issuers--a historical low not seen in over a decade since there were 11 downgrades in third-quarter 2010.
  • The net ratings bias further declined to 10.3% in September 2021 from 14.7% in June. While transportation had the highest downgrade potential, automotive reported the highest positive bias.

S&P Global Ratings upgraded 28 European corporate issuers in third-quarter 2021 while 13 issuers were downgraded. Upgrades among speculative-grade issuers once again led rating actions in the third quarter (see chart 1). In turn, the downgrade rate fell to 32% in the quarter, the lowest since the 99% reported in second-quarter 2020.

Further, in September 2021, the 12-month trailing speculative-grade default rate fell to 3.4%, and we expect it to fall to at least 3.25% by June 2022.

Chart 1

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (1)

Globally, rating actions so far in 2021 have been largely positive, supported by economic recoveries, less-stringent mobility restrictions, and accommodative financing conditions (see table 1). In Europe particularly, vaccination progress has enabled governments to ease mobility restrictions. While consumer demand has picked up, the economic rebound has contributed to shortages of raw materials and heightened energy prices. We expect supply bottlenecks and the accompanying rise in costs to be transitory. Tapering has been announced in principal by Bank of England (BOE) and the European Central Bank (ECB), with precise details expected in the coming weeks.

Table 1

Upgrades Surpass Downgrades As Credit Conditions Show Signs Of Normalizing In The Third Quarter
OverallInvestment-gradeSpeculative-gradeFinancialNonfinancial
Downgrades
Number of issuers13 4 9 1 12
Debt volume (bil. $)70 13 57 0 69
Upgrades
Number of issuers28 9 19 4 24
Debt volume (bil. $)157 114 43 7 149
Total rating actions
Number of issuers41 13 28 5 36
Debt volume (bil. $)226 126 100 8 219
Downgrade ratio (%)32 31 32 20 33
Historical average*6565595867
High, quarter100% 1995Q1100% 2003Q1100% 2002Q1100% 2020Q4100% 1997Q1
Low, quarter27% 2014Q213% 2017Q40% 1998Q10% 2019Q125% 1996Q4
Negative bias (%)17 14 20 14 18
Historical average*22 20 23 22 22
High, quarter41% 2009Q236% 2009Q256% 2009Q249% 2012Q441% 2020Q2
Low, quarter11% 1997Q410% 2017Q40% 1995Q23% 2007Q111% 2014Q2
Positive bias (%)7 4 10 6 7
Historical average*8 7 14 8 9
High, quarter14% 1998Q312% 2018Q156% 1995Q419% 2018Q118% 1998Q3
Low, quarter3% 2009Q12% 2009Q14% 2020Q21% 2009Q13% 2020Q2
Note: Rating actions and bias figures exclude issuers with no rated debt outstanding. *From first-quarter 1995 to third-quarter 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.

Reflecting the recovery, the negative bias for the region dropped to 17.1% in September 2021 from 38.8% in September 2020. The negative bias represents the proportion of companies that either had a negative outlook or were placed on CreditWatch negative during the quarter. All sectors except for health care and high technology reported a decline in the negative bias in the third quarter.

The negative bias among the 'CCC+' or below rated European issuers was higher than 45% (see chart 2). Over the past year, most rating categories saw a decline in the negative bias. The largest decline was seen in the 'B+' rating category, where the bias declined to 15% in September 2021 from 55% in September 2020. Similarly, over the past quarter, the largest decline in the negative bias was among the 'B+' and 'CCC+' rating categories.

Chart 2

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (2)

Of the 13 downgrades recorded as of third-quarter 2021, 12 stem from nonfinancial corporates. Downgrades have been contracting each quarter since peaking at 149 in second-quarter 2020 and now represent the lowest figure since third-quarter 2010.

The number of upgrades also declined--to 28 in third-quarter 2021 from 33 in the second quarter. Upgrades were led by speculative-grade and nonfinancial issuers. Despite a slight decline in upgrades over the quarter, upgrades have almost returned to prepandemic levels, albeit from lower ratings than before the pandemic.

With upgrades surpassing downgrades in the third quarter, the downgrade ratio declined to 32%, significantly lower than its historical average of 65% (see table 1).

Rating Actions

Majority (24) of the upgrades in the third quarter were from the nonfinancial sector (see chart 3). The Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services sector led upgrades, with four, followed by health care, oil and gas and the transportation sector with three upgrades each.

Correspondingly, downgrades were led by the health care sector, with three, followed by the utilities and consumer products sector with two each.

Chart 3

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (3)

Negative Bias Continued To Decline

The negative bias among European financial and nonfinancial corporates narrowed to 17.1% in the third quarter of 2021 from 21.2% in the second quarter (see chart 4). This compares significantly lower against the negative bias of 38.8% recorded in the third quarter of 2020. The positive bias expanded to 6.8% in the third quarter of 2021 from 6.5% in the second quarter. By contrast, the third quarter of 2020, recorded a significantly lower positive bias of 3.3%.

Chart 4

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (4)

Chart 5

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (5)

The negative bias among European financial companies contracted to 14.5% in the third quarter, down from 15.5% in the second quarter and less than half of the negative bias recorded in third-quarter 2020 (see chart 5). The positive bias remained pegged at 5.8% in the third quarter. The positive bias seen in the second and third quarters of 2021 is the highest recorded positive bias financial corporates have seen since March 2020. The financial companies' net overall bias (i.e., the difference between positive bias and negative bias) narrowed to 8.7% in September 2021 from 9.7% in June 2021 and 30.4% in September 2020.

Chart 6

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (6)

For European nonfinancial corporates, the negative bias contracted to 17.8% as of September 2021 from 22.6% as of June (see chart 6). During the same period, the positive bias marginally increased to 7% from 6.7% and the net overall bias declined to 10.7% in September 2021 from 15.9% in June.

bias declined across all countries with five or more rated issuers (see chart 7). Austria recorded the highest negative bias, with 31.6% as of March 31, 2021, while Cyprus had the highest positive bias in the region, with 21.4%. Poland had a positive bias of March 31, 2021, while Cyprus had the highest positive bias in the region, with 21.4%. Poland had a positive bias of 20% and reported the highest net overall bias of 20% as of the third quarter. Negative bias in the U.K., which comprises about 20% of all European issuers, declined to 20.4% in the period, from 26.3% in the second quarter--in line with the country's well-paced recovery.

Chart 7

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (7)

Transportation showed the highest downgrade potential for the second consecutive quarter, although the automotive sector shows improvement (see chart 8). As of third-quarter 2021, the transportation sector reported downgrade potential of 45%, down from 50% in the second quarter. While global container and dry bulk shipping are supporting recovery in the sector, the growth of air travel remains sluggish. Despite domestic and short-haul leisure travel powering the air travel segment, growth of the sector remains contingent on corporate traffic, which we think will see a lag in recovery. The industry is also prone to varying risks, such as vaccine hesitancy and the persistence of fuel price pressures.

Chart 8

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (8)

The automotive sector reported a positive bias of 14.3% as of Sept. 30, 2021--the highest positive bias among all sectors in the region. Since the beginning of the year, the downgrade potential in the sector has fallen, declining to 18% as of September 2021 from 43% as of March 2021 and 72% as of September 2020. Globally, recovery in the auto sector is helmed by conducive demand, favorable pricing, fiscal stimulus in primary auto markets, and greater reliance on private mobility.

The downgrade potential declined among all sectors except insurance from Sept. 30, 2020, to Sept. 30, 2021 (see chart 9).

Chart 9

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (9)

Chart 10

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (10)

Chart 11

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (11)

Appendix

Table 2

Trends In European Corporate Ratings
Defaulted issuersWeakest linksFallen angelsRising stars
2011 Q11 12 7 2
2011 Q21 16 1 4
2011 Q30 16 2 0
2011 Q42 20 8 2
2012 Q13 18 6 1
2012 Q23 19 8 0
2012 Q31 25 7 0
2012 Q42 30 5 2
2013 Q15 28 3 2
2013 Q23 23 1 1
2013 Q32 24 2 1
2013 Q46 26 2 4
2014 Q11 25 1 2
2014 Q20 18 1 2
2014 Q34 14 1 1
2014 Q41 15 1 7
2015 Q14 20 2 1
2015 Q27 16 2 2
2015 Q31 18 0 4
2015 Q44 22 0 3
2016 Q11 33 2 3
2016 Q27 32 1 3
2016 Q33 35 1 0
2016 Q44 31 3 1
2017 Q14 31 0 2
2017 Q24 24 1 4
2017 Q33 24 2 5
2017 Q46 20 1 2
2018 Q12 20 0 4
2018 Q22 21 1 2
2018 Q35 25 0 2
2018 Q44 26 1 4
2019 Q13 24 0 1
2019 Q24 30 1 1
2019 Q33 38 0 1
2019 Q45 44 0 3
2020 Q14 72 4 0
2020 Q212 106 6 0
2020 Q313 97 3 0
2020 Q413 86 1 1
2021 Q18 72 1 2
2021 Q2
2021 Q3*
Data as of Sept. 30, 2021. *Weakest links data as of Aug. 31, 2021. Fallen angels and rising stars exclude issuers with no rated debt outstanding. Defaulted issuers include confidentially rated entities. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.

Table 3

European Corporate Rating Actions, Third-Quarter 2021
DateIssuerSectorCountryRating actionToFrom
July 1, 2021Weatherford International PLCOil and gasIrelandUpgradeCCC+CCC
July 5, 2021Nets Topco 3 S.a r.l.High technologyDenmarkUpgradeBB-B-
July 6, 2021CAB (Laboratoire Eimer SELAS)Health careFranceUpgradeBB-
July 7, 2021Transocean Ltd.Oil and gasSwitzerlandUpgradeCCCCCC-
July 12, 2021Foodco Bondco SAURetail/restaurantsSpainUpgradeCCC+CCC-
July 13, 2021EnQuest PLCOil and gasU.K.UpgradeB-CCC+
July 19, 2021McLaren Group Ltd.AutomotiveU.K.UpgradeCCC+CCC
July 21, 2021AstraZeneca PLCHealth careU.K.UpgradeA-BBB+
July 22, 2021Bleriot Midco Ltd.Aerospace and defenseU.K.UpgradeBB-
July 22, 2021LyondellBasell Industries N.V.Chemicals, packaging, and environmental servicesNetherlandsUpgradeBBBBBB-
July 22, 2021MEIF 5 Arena Holdings SLUUtilitiesSpainDowngradeB+BB-
July 23, 20213i Group PLCFinancial institutionsU.K.UpgradeBBB+BBB
July 23, 2021Hunter Holdco 3 Ltd.Health careU.K.UpgradeBB-
July 27, 2021Daimler AGAutomotiveGermanyUpgradeA-BBB+
July 28, 2021L'Air Liquide S.A.Chemicals, packaging, and environmental servicesFranceUpgradeAA-
July 29, 2021B&M European Value Retail S.A.Retail/restaurantsLuxembourgUpgradeBBBB-
July 29, 2021CEVA Logistics AGTransportationSwitzerlandUpgradeBBBB-
July 29, 2021CMA CGM S.A.TransportationFranceUpgradeBBBB-
July 30, 2021James Hardie International Group Ltd.Forest products and building materialsIrelandUpgradeBB+BB
August 2, 2021Breitling Holdings S.a r.l.Consumer productsLuxembourgUpgradeBB-
August 4, 2021Albea Beauty Holdings S.A. (Hercule Debtco S.a r.l.)Chemicals, packaging, and environmental servicesFranceDowngradeB-B
August 5, 2021Saipem SpAOil and gasItalyDowngradeBBBB+
August 6, 2021Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCAForest products and building materialsSwedenUpgradeBBBBBB-
August 13, 2021DTZ UK Guarantor Ltd.Financial institutionsU.K.UpgradeBB-B+
August 23, 2021William Hill Ltd.Media and entertainmentU.K.DowngradeBBB-
August 24, 2021KION Group AGCapital goodsGermanyUpgradeBBB-BB+
September 1, 2021Babco*ck International Group PLCConsumer productsU.K.DowngradeBBB-BBB
September 2, 2021Endo International PLCHealth careIrelandDowngradeCCC+B-
September 6, 2021Western Power Distribution PLC (PPL Corp.)UtilitiesU.K.DowngradeBBB+A-
September 10, 2021K+S AGChemicals, packaging, and environmental servicesGermanyUpgradeB+B
September 10, 2021Perrigo Company plcHealth careIrelandDowngradeBBBBB-
September 14, 2021A.P. Moller - Maersk A/STransportationDenmarkUpgradeBBB+BBB
September 15, 2021Element Materials Technology Ltd.Consumer productsU.K.DowngradeB-B
September 15, 2021Helvetia Schweizerische Versicherungsgesellschaft AGInsuranceSwitzerlandUpgradeA+A
September 16, 2021Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG (Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG)InsuranceGermanyUpgradeAA-
September 20, 2021Atos SEHigh technologyFranceDowngradeBBB-BBB+
September 21, 2021Grifols S.A.Health careSpainDowngradeBB-BB
September 21, 2021OCI N.V.Chemicals, packaging, and environmental servicesNetherlandsUpgradeBB+BB
September 28, 2021Lorca Telecom Bidco S.A.U.TelecommunicationsSpainDowngradeBB+
September 29, 2021Almaviva S.p.A.High technologyItalyUpgradeB+B
September 30, 2021Amigo Loans Ltd.Financial institutionsU.K.DowngradeCCCCCC+
Data as of Sept. 30, 2021. Source: S&P Global Ratings Research.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Global Ratings Research:Kirsten R Mccabe, New York+ 1 (212) 438 3196;
kirsten.mccabe@spglobal.com
Nick W Kraemer, FRM, New York+ 1 (212) 438 1698;
nick.kraemer@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Tanya Dias, Mumbai;
tanya.dias@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

I'm an expert in financial analysis and credit ratings with a deep understanding of the European corporate landscape. My expertise lies in interpreting and analyzing credit rating trends, bias indicators, and economic factors affecting the financial health of corporations. I have hands-on experience in evaluating creditworthiness, tracking rating actions, and providing insights into the dynamics of credit markets.

Now, let's delve into the information provided in the article:

  1. Upgrades and Downgrades in European Corporates (Q3 2021):

    • Upgrades in Q3 2021: 28 European corporate issuers, with a focus on speculative-grade and nonfinancial sectors, especially in chemicals, packaging, and environmental services.
    • Downgrades in Q3 2021: Only 13 European corporate issuers, marking a historical low not seen since Q3 2010.
  2. Net Ratings Bias and Downgrade Ratio:

    • Net ratings bias declined to 10.3% in September 2021 from 14.7% in June 2021.
    • Downgrade ratio fell to 32% in Q3 2021, the lowest since Q2 2020.
  3. Speculative-Grade Default Rate:

    • 12-month trailing speculative-grade default rate fell to 3.4% in September 2021, expected to decrease to at least 3.25% by June 2022.
  4. Global Rating Actions in 2021:

    • Positive global rating actions supported by economic recoveries, reduced mobility restrictions, and favorable financing conditions.
  5. European Economic Factors:

    • Vaccination progress enabling easing of mobility restrictions.
    • Economic rebound contributing to raw material shortages and heightened energy prices.
    • Supply bottlenecks expected to be transitory.
    • Tapering announced by Bank of England (BOE) and the European Central Bank (ECB).
  6. Negative Bias among European Corporates:

    • Negative bias dropped to 17.1% in September 2021 from 38.8% in September 2020.
    • Negative bias declined across all sectors except health care and high technology.
  7. Bias Trends for Financial and Nonfinancial Corporates:

    • Negative bias for financial companies contracted to 14.5% in Q3 2021.
    • Positive bias for financial corporates recorded the highest since March 2020.
    • Negative bias for nonfinancial corporates declined to 17.8% in Q3 2021.
  8. Sector-Specific Insights:

    • Transportation sector had the highest downgrade potential for two consecutive quarters.
    • Automotive sector reported the highest positive bias among all sectors.
    • Health care led downgrades, while chemicals, packaging, and environmental services led upgrades.
  9. Country-Specific Bias Trends:

    • Negative bias in the U.K. declined to 20.4% in Q3 2021 from 26.3% in Q2 2021.
  10. Outlook for Various Sectors:

    • Transportation sector facing challenges despite improvements in container and dry bulk shipping.
    • Automotive sector experiencing recovery supported by demand, pricing, fiscal stimulus, and private mobility.

In conclusion, the European corporate landscape in Q3 2021 saw a notable trend of upgrades outpacing downgrades, with positive bias and declining negative bias across sectors. The analysis also considered global economic factors and specific sector and country dynamics, providing a comprehensive overview of the credit landscape.

Credit Trends: European Corporate Credit Quality Continues To Improve In Third Quarter (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Francesca Jacobs Ret

Last Updated:

Views: 5590

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (68 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Francesca Jacobs Ret

Birthday: 1996-12-09

Address: Apt. 141 1406 Mitch Summit, New Teganshire, UT 82655-0699

Phone: +2296092334654

Job: Technology Architect

Hobby: Snowboarding, Scouting, Foreign language learning, Dowsing, Baton twirling, Sculpting, Cabaret

Introduction: My name is Francesca Jacobs Ret, I am a innocent, super, beautiful, charming, lucky, gentle, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.